- Tags: campagne, Cina, innovazione, libertà, nuove-tecnologie, progresso, ricerca, robot, sviluppo
- Un commento

(Credits: AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko)
Rientra a pieno titolo in questa categoria Wu Lulu, 50 anni, un tempo un semplice agricoltore che non aveva ricevuto alcun tipo di istruzione, ma che dopo vent’anni di tentativi falliti è finalmente riuscito a costruire semplici robot-giocattolo servendosi di frammenti e scarti trovati per strada o altrove. Non senza imprevisti, vito che gli è capitato, per fortuna solo una volta, di bruciarsi il volto e di far saltare in aria la casa -di paglia e legno- per aver commesso la leggerezza di confondere un piccolo ma pericolosissimo detonatore con una innocua batteria.
Bambole fatte di ricambi di lavatrici che si inchinano, bambini che tirano un carretto di fil di ferro e portantini composti da rifiuti di vario genere -è questo il modello più famoso, noto ai più come Wu 32, il robot che parla: è stato impostato per dare il bevenuto alle potenziali bambole-clienti con un caloroso “ciao a tutti, il signor Wu è mio padre”- hanno permesso a Wu Lulu di aggiudicarsi il primo premio in una competizione televisiva per inventori amatoriali, che oltre alla notorietà ha portato allo scienziato-contadino il denaro necessario per scambiare i suoi terreni per una fabbrica dove, con l’aiuto di 50 collaboratori, costruisce robot da vendere al pubblico.
Tra i suoi sostenitori non rientrano di certo i compaesani con cui ha condiviso per anni gli alti e bassi della produttività dei rispettivi terreni visto che lo hanno sempre accusato di “trascurare i raccolti per occuparsi di strani congegni“. Il partito, invece, non fa che promuovere suoi interventi nelle scuole e nelle università: “la sua vita è un esempio perfetto di come un normalissimo cinese possa, lavorando sodo, ottenere importanti successi e migliorare il proprio status, il proprio futuro e quello dell’intera nazione”.
A Pechino c’è chi è convinto che iniziative come queste dimostrino che “la Cina non ha più bisogno di importare (e copiare) software e tecnologie avanzate dall’estero ma può farcela da sola ad alimentare l’upgrade industriale che permetterà di giustificare stipendi più alti che, a loro volta, miglioreranno la qualità della vita per una grossa fetta della popolazione”, ha spiegato un docente di un’università della capitale. Inoltre, per il partito concedere alla popolazione di sfogare la propria creatività permetterà alla Cina non solo di presentarsi sul mercato internazionale con nuovi brevetti e prodotti tecnologicamente innovativi, ma anche di rispondere alle accuse secondo cui la Repubblica popolare “sarebbe ancora oggi un paese autoritario che non lascia spazio alla creatività, quando iniziative come quella di Wu Lulu dimostrano esattamente il contrario”.
Solo dal punto di vista cinese, ovviamente, perché da fuori non sembra che la Cina stia facendo molto per diventare meno dispotica, e nessuco riesce a farsi persuadere che scienziati-contadini possano portare la Repubblica popolare a confrontarsi alla pari con i leader mondiali delle nuove tecnologie.
- Mercoledì 4 Maggio 2011
EURO SI O NO?
STRATEGIE E NUMERI DELLA BIG IPO
COME SI CALCOLA
LA CRISI IN CIFRE
FAME, DISOCCUPAZIONE, NUOVI POVERI
ECONOMIA 2.0
IL PIANO MONTI
LA RIFORMA: ARTICOLO 18, PROPOSTE, DIBATTITO
LA RIFORMA, I NUMERI, LE POLEMICHE
RIVOLUZIONE IN CORSO PER LA UE
START UP E IL NETWORK ITALIA-USA
APPLE - LUCI E OMBRE
FOTOGRAFIA EUROPEA 2012
IL GRAFICO DELLA SETTIMANA
VITE STRAORDINARIE
DIETRO LE QUINTE
IL MADE IN ITALY DI SUCCESSO










IL MEGLIO DEL 2011
G20 di Cannes: i protagonisti e le loro sfide






Commenti
Puoi lasciare un commento, oppure fare trackback dal tuo sito.
Il 6 Maggio 2011 alle 10:52 yahuwah ha scritto:
America’s Terminal Decline vs The Rise of China
America’s Decline and Fall
In his book titled, “The World in Crisis,” historian Gabriel Kolko believes that America’s decline “began after the Korean War, was continued in relation to Cuba, and was greatly accelerated in Vietnam - but (GW Bush did) much to exacerbate it further.” Obama not only continues Bush policies, he exceeded him with greater recklessness, masquerading as a people’s president while waging war on working Americans.
No wonder Kolko thinks US influence is declining everywhere. The world no longer depends on its economic might. Nations like China, India, Brazil and others grow much faster, and after the Soviet Union collapsed, “the absence of identifiable foes has been a disaster, leaving the US aimless. (So) it picks and chooses enemies” globally in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa, and perhaps later China and Russia while other nations increasingly tire of imperial America and its reckless economics counterproductive to their own.
As a result, America’s century of dominance is ending. Immanuel Wallerstein agrees, saying it’s been fading since the 1970s, accelerating post-9/11. In fact, “the economic, political and military factors that contributed to US hegemony are the same (ones) inexorably produc(ing) the coming US decline.”
Chalmers Johnson called it the same dynamic that doomed past empires - “isolation, overstretch, the uniting of local and global forces opposed to imperialism, and in the end bankruptcy,” combined with growing authoritarianism and loss of personal freedom.
Calling America’s condition dire, he said it’s “too late for mere scattered reforms of our government or bloated military to make much difference.” History is clear. We can choose democracy and survive or continue as present and perish. Clearly the wrong political, social, military, and economic choices were made, heading US hegemony for the ash heap of history.
Nixon’s Council of Economic Advisers chairman, Herb Stein, notably explained, saying, “Things that can’t go on forever, won’t.” Earlier, Johnson said:
The “combination of huge standing armies, almost continuous wars, military Keynesianism, and ruinous military expenses have destroyed our republican structure in favor of an imperial presidency. We are on the cusp of losing our democracy for the sake of keeping our empire.”
Moreover, once a nation starts down that path and won’t change, its end time is certain. Only its timing is unknown, perhaps coming faster than expected.
America’s Dollar Hegemony in Decline
Global plans to replace the dollar metaphorically highlight America’s decline, the topic economist Michael Hudson addressed in his June 13, 2009 article titled, “De-Dollarization: Dismantling America’s Financial-Military Empire.”
For decades, America stayed economically dominant because other nations agreed to a Washington controlled WTO/IMF/World Bank/Bank for International Settlements (the Central Bank of Central Banks in Basel) system, using the dollar as the world’s reserve currency.
Other countries, however, now balk. A June 2009 Yekaterinburg, Russia meeting with top officials of the six-nation Shanghai Cooperation Organization (led by China and Russia) took the first step to end dollar supremacy, perhaps replacing it eventually with a single global currency or a basket of major ones.
Today, America remains unchallenged militarily, its economic supremacy, however, weakening as it staggers under growing debt, while nations like China, Brazil, India, Russia and others are rising.
In July, 2009, Russian President Medvedev advocated a supranational currency. In September, the UN Conference on Trade and Development proposed an artificial one to replace the dollar. Other alliances, including nine Latin American countries, support a regional currency. China wants its yuan protected, and Russia plans to begin trading in the ruble and local currencies.
Hudson calls the present system a “sinister dynamic (because) the US payment deficit pumps dollars into foreign economies (that have) little option except to buy US (debt) which the Treasury spends on financing an enormous, hostile (global) military build-up,” and its ready-to-unleash-anytime war machine.
Moreover, foreign US Treasury buyers may not only be financing their own endangerment, they’re also buying a depreciating asset, what analyst Matthias Chang calls dollar denominated “toilet paper” from a “toilet paper printing press….issu(ing) irredeemable fiat money.”
Why else would world demand for gold and silver be strong. They reflect real value, not paper backed solely by the eroding faith and credit of issuing countries. Buyers clearly lack it in America with good reason. As a result, expect further dollar erosion, decline and perhaps crisis if current selling ahead surges.
No wonder other countries seek a new monetary system to avoid funding America’s deficit and military. BRIC nations (China, Russia, India and Brazil) took the lead. Others are now following, and the weaker the dollar gets, inevitably they’ll be more.
Economist Paul Craig Roberts also believes the dollar’s global reserve currency hegemony won’t last. Sooner or later wholesale dumping will happen when foreign central banks unload them. As a result, import prices will rise enough to make Wal-Mart shoppers “think they have mistakenly gone into Neiman Marcus.”
Domestic prices will also soar “as a growing money supply chases the supply of goods and services still made” domestically. Disruptions will follow. The dollar won’t survive. When it goes America’s trade deficit can’t be financed. Imports will fall sharply. Inflation will rise, and “(p)anic will be the order of the day” because a corporate - government cabal is “strung out on the ecstasy of Empire,” and obsessed with destroying the nation’s middle class to transfer maximum wealth to America’s super-rich already with too much.
A Final Comment
Consider how far America declined and the inevitable consequences. The combination of:
– military Keynesianism;
– permanent wars;
– Washington being corporate occupied territory;
– banker bailouts;
– generous handouts to corporate favorites;
– offshoring the nation’s industrial base;
– neoliberal austerity;
– class warfare, including against unionism;
– systemic corruption;
– increasing repression;
– sham elections; and
– democracy in name only, the best money can buy, made America no longer a model for other nations, the engine of world growth, a fit to live in, or able to prevent its inevitable decline, fall, and replacement by China and perhaps other nations one day.
It’s a sad testimony to a two centuries old experiment that failed because absolute power corrupted too many with it wanting more.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
Devi aver fatto log-in per inserire un commento.